Re: Database size Vs performance degradation
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Database size Vs performance degradation |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 25537.1217430316@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Database size Vs performance degradation ("Dave North" <DNorth@signiant.com>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
"Dave North" <DNorth@signiant.com> writes: > From: Richard Huxton [mailto:dev@archonet.com] >> Well, that's pretty much the definition of bloat. Are you sure you're >> vacuuming enough? > DN: Well, the auto-vac is kicking off pretty darn frequently...around > once every 2 minutes. However, you just made me think of the obvious - > is it actually doing anything?! The app is pretty darn write intensive > so I wonder if it's actually able to vacuum the tables? IIRC, the default autovac parameters in 8.1 were pretty darn unaggressive. You should also check for long-running transactions that might be preventing vacuum from removing recently-dead rows. One of the reasons for updating off 8.1 is that finding out what autovac is really doing is hard :-(. I think it does log, but at level DEBUG2 or so, which means that the only way to find out is to accept a huge amount of useless chatter in the postmaster log. Newer releases have a saner logging scheme. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: