Re: Autovaccuum vs temp tables crash
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Autovaccuum vs temp tables crash |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 25504.1550846742@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Autovaccuum vs temp tables crash (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Autovaccuum vs temp tables crash
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes: > The reason for the crash is 6d842be6c11, where Tom added an assert for > passing null into %s. But I don't think we can blame that patch for the > problem -- it's passing the NULL there in the first place that's the > problem. Indeed; this crash existed on some platforms all along (which means we'd better back-patch the fix). > AFAICT the actual drop works fine, it's just the logging that crashes. So > maybe we should just add a check and make it log something like "<dropped>" > if pg_namespace_name() returns null? +1 ... maybe "(dropped)", because we tend to use parens for this sort of thing, I think. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: