Re: Re: Call for platforms
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Re: Call for platforms |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 2549.985654424@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Re: Call for platforms (Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>) |
Ответы |
Re: Re: Call for platforms
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu> writes: >> "PPC750"? What's that? "PPC G3" might be more likely to mean something >> to onlookers ... > Actually "G3" means nothing outside of Apple afaict. The 750 series is a > follow-on to the 60x series, and there is a 7xxx series also. From my > pov, using an accepted label, rather than a marketing (re)label, better > indicates *what* this actually can run on. I'm not sure that I have it > labeled correctly yet, but "G3" is not a step in the right direction. I found an apparently current "PowerPC CPU Summary" at http://e-www.motorola.com/webapp/sps/technology/tech_tutorial.jsp?catId=M943030621280 If accurate, the chip in this PowerBook is *not* a 750, since that tops out at 400 MHz. Apple offered this model in 400 and 500 MHz speeds, which makes it either a 7400 or 7410 chip ... > Should I put "Mac G3" in the comment section? Yes, if you won't put it where it should be ;-). I'm still of the opinion that "G3" will mean something to a vastly larger population than "750" or "7400" would. The latter are "marketing relabels" too you know; Motorola's internal designation would probably be something else entirely. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: