Re: Upgrading our minimum required flex version for 8.5
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Upgrading our minimum required flex version for 8.5 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 25485.1247442200@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Upgrading our minimum required flex version for 8.5 (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes: > Josh Berkus wrote: >> Oh, I didn't think about the Flex version. That's going to be a far >> more widespread problem. OSX 10.5, for example, still ships with >> 2.5.33. I suspect that a *lot* of OSes won't have anything up-to-date. > That's the version Tom is proposing to make the minimum. Yeah, 2.5.33 is fine (in fact it's what I installed on my HPUX box to replace 2.5.4). AFAICS OSX 10.5 is fine, but 10.4 will need a newer flex version. This is not anything very new to Mac users. 10.4 also shipped with bison 1.28, which is too old to build Postgres and has been too old for many years now. So anyone building from CVS on that platform has already installed at least one nondefault tool. (For comparison's sake: flex 2.5.4 was released in 1996. 2.5.31, which I'm proposing to make the new minimum, was released in 2003. Bison 1.875, our current minimum for that tool, was released in 2002, and we made it the minimum required version in 2003.) regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: