Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: simple script to pull together a very small (<500k) tar file
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: simple script to pull together a very small (<500k) tar file |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 25464.1193766616@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: simple script to pull together a very small (<500k) tar file (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: simple script to pull together a
very small (<500k) tar file
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes: > Interesting ... may I inquire what is this for? And why was it applied > so late in the cycle, without any previous proposal or discussion? This is an outgrowth of a core discussion that really should've been taken public before anything was done about it. Tut tut Marc --- after watching Jan get raked over the coals for adding a contrib module without public discussion, did you really think this would be considered OK? Anyway, before any more complaints ensue: the discussion was about whether it's still worth creating the "split tarballs" version of Postgres releases. You can't really get away without downloading all the sections, but we've seen more than one newbie try to do that and get confused. The tentative conclusion among core was that we should abandon the current split setup, but that it'd be worth seeing if a cut-down tarball good only for building libpq could be provided. So Marc went off to experiment with that. But we need to have a public discussion before implementing the plan ... regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: