Re: Directory/File Access Permissions for COPY and Generic File Access Functions
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Directory/File Access Permissions for COPY and Generic File Access Functions |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 25457.1414598940@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Directory/File Access Permissions for COPY and Generic File Access Functions (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Directory/File Access Permissions for COPY and Generic
File Access Functions
Re: Directory/File Access Permissions for COPY and Generic File Access Functions |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> writes: > * Robert Haas (robertmhaas@gmail.com) wrote: >> I think the question is "just how innumerable are those attack >> routes"? So, we can prevent a symlink from being used via O_NOFOLLOW. >> But what about hard links? > You can't hard link to files you don't own. That restriction exists on only some platforms. Current OS X for instance seems perfectly willing to allow it (suggesting that most BSDen probably do likewise), and I see no language supporting your claim in the POSIX spec for link(2). This points up the fact that platform-specific security holes are likely to be a huge part of the problem. I won't even speculate about our odds of building something that's secure on Windows. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: