Re: PQ versions request message
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PQ versions request message |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 25446.1126211268@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PQ versions request message (James William Pye <pgsql@jwp.name>) |
Ответы |
Re: PQ versions request message
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
James William Pye <pgsql@jwp.name> writes: > The point is to give client authors the ability to authoritatively > resolve ambiguity that may exist in multiversion supporting clients and > to do so without any version specific code(or at a minimum wrt older > servers) or fingerprinting of any sort. Had we had such a facility from the beginning, it would indeed have that benefit. But unless you are going to start out by dropping client-side support for all extant server versions, you will not get any such benefit; you'll still need retry code. So I still think this isn't really worth the trouble it would take to implement. Also, you keep referring to caching the result on the client side and re-using it across multiple connections --- but you can do that now, so why is that an argument in favor? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: