Re: [HACKERS] psql casts aspersions on server reliability
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] psql casts aspersions on server reliability |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 2543635.1700699932@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] psql casts aspersions on server reliability (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] psql casts aspersions on server reliability
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes: > On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 09:14:41AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> I could go along with just dropping the last sentence ("This probably...") >> if the last error we got was FATAL level. I don't find "unexpectedly" >> to be problematic here: from the point of view of psql, and probably >> of its user, the shutdown *was* unexpected. > I looked at this thread from 2016 and I think the problem is the > "abnormally" word, since if the server was shutdown by the administrator > (most likely), it isn't abnormal. Here is a patch to remove > "abnormally". I do not think this is an improvement. The places you are changing are reacting to a connection closure. *If* we had previously gotten a "FATAL: terminating connection due to administrator command" message, then yeah the connection closure is expected; but if not, it isn't. Your patch adds no check for that. (As I remarked in 2016, we could probably condition this on the elevel being FATAL, rather than checking for specific error messages.) regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: