Re: Checkpoint Tuning Question
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Checkpoint Tuning Question |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 25426.1247078683@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Checkpoint Tuning Question (Dan Armbrust <daniel.armbrust.list@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Checkpoint Tuning Question
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Dan Armbrust <daniel.armbrust.list@gmail.com> writes: > On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 1:23 PM, Tom Lane<tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> Well, you could increase both those settings so as to put the >> checkpoints further apart, and/or increase checkpoint_completion_target >> to spread the checkpoint I/O over a larger fraction of the cycle. > Wouldn't increasing the length between checkpoints result in the > checkpoint process taking even longer to complete? You don't really care how long it takes. What you want is for it not to be chewing a bigger fraction of your I/O bandwidth than you can spare. Hence, you want it to take longer. Trying to shorten it is just going to make the spike worse. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: