Re: Skytools committed without hackers discussion/review
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Skytools committed without hackers discussion/review |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 25397.1192054751@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Skytools committed without hackers discussion/review (Florian Pflug <fgp.phlo.org@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Skytools committed without hackers discussion/review
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Florian Pflug <fgp.phlo.org@gmail.com> writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> I think txid_current_snapshot should read ActiveSnapshot. If the user wants >> to get a beginning-of-xact rather than beginning-of-statement snapshot from >> it, he should be required to call it in a serializable transaction. > Hm... does txid require that the snapshot it uses a valid in the sense that > its xmin follows OldestXmin? If not, we could keep the snapshot around for txid, > but still update our published xmin - which seems to be the main reason we care > about getting rid of old snapshots at all. Why should we complicate the main code like that for txid? I have not heard any argument why the function should be examining SerializableSnapshot instead of the current transaction snapshot. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: