Re: New CF app deployment
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: New CF app deployment |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 25391.1423313629@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: New CF app deployment (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: New CF app deployment
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes: > On Sat, Feb 7, 2015 at 1:02 AM, Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com> wrote: >> I'd like the ability to add a comment which does not get turned into an >> email. > I really don't ;) > The reason I really don't like that is that this now makes it impossible to > track the review status by just reading throught he mail thread. You have > to context-switch back and forth between the app and the archives. We had > this problem in the old system every now and then where reviews were > posted entirely in the old system... Yeah, people did that sometimes and it sucked. At the same time I see Jeff's point: 300-email threads tend to contain a lot of dross. Could we address it by allowing only *very short* annotations? The limiting case would be 1-bit annotations, ie you could star the important messages in a thread; but that might be too restrictive. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: