Re: Run pgindent now?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Run pgindent now? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 25375.1432581647@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Run pgindent now? (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes: > On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 03:12:24PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> The point is for the back branches to absorb pgindent-induced changes that >> have already happened in HEAD, so I'm not sure what you're getting at. > My point is uses of new typedefs names added in HEAD which are not > typedefs in the back branches will be pgindent'ed differently than > before, e.g. back branches use a variable 'aaa' which is not a typedef > in back branches, but if 'aaa' becomes a typedef in HEAD, references to > 'aaa' in back branches will be adjusted by pgindent. Right, and that's what we want, because the corresponding uses of 'aaa' as a variable will also have been changed in HEAD. The point of this exercise is to ensure that otherwise-equivalent code is indented the same in all branches. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: