Re: SE-PostgreSQL Specifications
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: SE-PostgreSQL Specifications |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 25372.1248534397@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: SE-PostgreSQL Specifications (Sam Mason <sam@samason.me.uk>) |
Ответы |
Re: SE-PostgreSQL Specifications
Re: SE-PostgreSQL Specifications |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Sam Mason <sam@samason.me.uk> writes: > Yes, that seems reasonable. The fact that you're still talking about > "confined users" is slightly worrying and would seem to imply that > there is still a superuser/normal user divide--it's probably just a > terminology thing though. There had better still be superusers. Or do you want the correctness of your backups to depend on whether your SELinux policy is correct? The first time somebody loses critical data because SELinux suppressed it from their pg_dump output, they're going to be on the warpath. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: