Re: obsoleting plpython2u and defaulting plpythonu to plpython3u
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: obsoleting plpython2u and defaulting plpythonu to plpython3u |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 25359.1524850498@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: obsoleting plpython2u and defaulting plpythonu to plpython3u (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: obsoleting plpython2u and defaulting plpythonu to plpython3u
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes: > Another alternative would be to have a 'plpython' extension that depends > on plpython2. That'd require users to specify CASCADE when creating it, > but that actually seems like it could be a useful hint... I think it's > probably not worth going that route though, because reassigning objects > from one extension to another is more work than reasonable... Yeah, there's a separate set of questions about what happens during pg_upgrade of a database containing the existing plpythonu extension. You could imagine hacking the dump/reload case by defining plpythonu as an empty extension with a dependency on plpython2u (or, maybe someday in future, a dependency on plpython3u). But that won't do the trick for binary upgrades; we might need special-case code in pg_dump/pg_upgrade to fix that. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: