Re: do {} while (0) nitpick
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: do {} while (0) nitpick |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 25358.1588368731@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: do {} while (0) nitpick (David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: do {} while (0) nitpick
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
David Steele <david@pgmasters.net> writes: > On 4/30/20 9:52 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote: >> On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 09:51:10PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >>> Yeah. I'd call these actual bugs, and perhaps even back-patch worthy. >> Agreed. Those semicolons could easily create bugs. > +1. The patch looks good to me. Grepping showed me that there were some not-do-while macros that also had trailing semicolons. These seem just as broken, so I fixed 'em all. There are remaining instances of this antipattern in the flex-generated scanners, which we can't do anything about; and in pl/plperl/ppport.h, which we shouldn't do anything about because that's upstream-generated code. (I wonder though if there's a newer version available.) regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: