On 3/2/18 03:23, Michael Paquier wrote:
> That's a better idea. I have reworked that in 0001. What do you think?
> This has the same effect as diag(), which shows information directly to
> the screen, and that's the behavior I was looking for.
I ended up using plan skip_all, which seems to be intended for this
purpose, according to the documentation.
> I have concluded about using the most simple name: PG_TEST_EXTRA. A
> documentation attempt is added as well. This is unfortunately close to
> EXTRA_TESTS. It would be tempting to directly reuse EXTRA_TESTS as
> well, however this is used only for the core regression tests now, so a
> separated variable seems adapted to me.
Committed. Very nice.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services