Re: problem with large maintenance_work_mem settings and

I wrote:
> Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc> writes:
>> samples  %        symbol name
>> 24915704 96.2170  ltsReleaseBlock

> We probably need to tweak things so this doesn't get called during the
> "final merge" pass.  Looking at it now.

I've committed a fix for this into CVS HEAD --- please try it out.
        regards, tom lane