Re: pgsql: Add suport for server-side LZ4 base backup compression.
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pgsql: Add suport for server-side LZ4 base backup compression. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 2523849.1644725570@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pgsql: Add suport for server-side LZ4 base backup compression. (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>) |
Ответы |
Re: pgsql: Add suport for server-side LZ4 base backup compression.
Re: pgsql: Add suport for server-side LZ4 base backup compression. |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> writes: > On Sat, Feb 12, 2022 at 05:16:03PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: >> I think adding an explicit PGAC_PATH_PROGS would be worth the cycles. > Well, this somebody is I, and the buildfarm did not blow up on any of > that so that looked rather fine. Eh? copperhead for one is failing for exactly this reason: Bailout called. Further testing stopped: failed to execute command "lz4 -d -m /home/pgbf/buildroot/HEAD/pgsql.build/src/bin/pg_verifybackup/tmp_check/t_008_untar_primary_data/backup/server-backup/base.tar.lz4": Nosuch file or directory > Adding a few cycles for this check > is fine by me. What do you think of the attached? Looks OK as far as it goes ... but do we need anything on the MSVC side? Also, I can't help wondering why we have both GZIP_PROGRAM and GZIP variables. I suppose that's a separate issue though. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: