Re: [PATCH] Space reservation v02
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PATCH] Space reservation v02 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 25192.1233335682@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PATCH] Space reservation v02 (Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com> writes: > Well having a column in pg_class does have some advantages. Like, you could > look at the value from an sql session more easily. And if there are operations > which we know are unsafe -- such as adding columns -- we could clear it from > the server side easily. Why would there be any unsafe operations? Surely the patch would add sufficient logic to prevent the old version from de-fixing any page that had already been fixed. If this is not so, the entire concept is broken, because you're still going to have to go to single-user mode for a long time to make sure that the whole database is in good shape. On the whole I agree with Heikki's earlier criticism: this is all about guessing the future, and the odds seem high that the actual requirements will not be what you designed for anyway. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: