Re: ALTER SYSTEM vs symlink
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: ALTER SYSTEM vs symlink |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 25169.1446477257@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: ALTER SYSTEM vs symlink (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: ALTER SYSTEM vs symlink
Re: ALTER SYSTEM vs symlink |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> writes: > * Andres Freund (andres@anarazel.de) wrote: >> You can just revoke permissions on the file if necessary. Results in the >> expected >> ERROR: XX000: could not open file "../postgresql.auto.conf": Permission denied > Yes, I know, but that's a really grotty way of offering a way to disable > ALTER SYSTEM. It's also not exactly intuitive to someone reading the > release notes or working on upgrading their existing postgresql.conf. While I won't stand in the way if someone is dead set on providing a disable switch for ALTER SYSTEM, I fail to see the point of one. It's a superuser-only feature to begin with, and if you are handing out superuser on production-critical installations to people you don't trust completely, you need to have your head examined. As a directly comparable example, I note that you yourself were in favor of getting rid of rolcatupdate, which was the only mechanism we ever had that could prevent a superuser from destroying the catalogs entirely with a mistyped update --- consider "DELETE FROM pg_proc", for example, which unlike ALTER SYSTEM there is simply no way to recover from. How is it that we don't need rolcatupdate but we do need a way to shut off ALTER SYSTEM? Doesn't compute, IMO. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: