Re: [CORE] Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [CORE] Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 25150.1188849627@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [CORE] Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [CORE] Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)
Re: [CORE] Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) Re: [CORE] Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) Re: [CORE] Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> Of course, that's 70% of -advocacy, which by nature is going to be the >> subset of the community most interested in this change and least >> interested in the ensuing costs. > It seems there were a significant number of people with swag who will > pay the cost somehow. That's adopting exactly the view I thought it was, that only directly marketing-related costs matter. Again, this seems to be considering only advocacy-related concerns. I'll confine my reply to one point: do you have any idea what will happen if I try to change the default PGDATA location on Red Hat from /var/lib/pgsql to something else? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: