Re: [PERFORM] A Better External Sort?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PERFORM] A Better External Sort? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 25130.1128628658@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PERFORM] A Better External Sort? (Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: [PERFORM] A Better External Sort?
Re: [PERFORM] A Better External Sort? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org> writes: > Indeed, one of the things on my list is to remove all the lseeks in > favour of pread. Halving the number of kernel calls has got to be worth > something right? Portability is an issue ofcourse... Being sure that it's not a pessimization is another issue. I note that glibc will emulate these functions if the kernel doesn't have them; which means you could be replacing one kernel call with three. And I don't think autoconf has any way to determine whether a libc function represents a native kernel call or not ... regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: