Re: obsolete indexing method "rtree"
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: obsolete indexing method "rtree" |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 2510904.1596636088@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | obsolete indexing method "rtree" (Jürgen Purtz <juergen@purtz.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: obsolete indexing method "rtree"
|
Список | pgsql-docs |
=?UTF-8?Q?J=c3=bcrgen_Purtz?= <juergen@purtz.de> writes: > We removed the indexing method "rtree" in version 8.3 and replaced it > with "gist". Until today there are some "rtree" heritages: > * "CREATE INDEX ... USING rtree ..." is valid syntax and leads to the > message "NOTICE: substituting access method gist for obsolete > method rtree" > * The documentation refers to the method in ref/comments.sgml and > ref/create_index.sgml. > * The documentation uses the term "R-Tree" in gist.sgml, seg.sgml, and > xindex.sgml. That's ok because in this cases it refers to the > abstract concept of R-trees and not to the eliminated implementation. > Isn't it time to disallow this syntax and remove all references and > messages? Why? It's not hurting anything to continue the substitution in CREATE INDEX. The example in comments.sgml is just an example, and is not meant to reflect a built-in object any more than the adjacent examples are. Possibly the comment in seg.sgml should be adjusted to refer to GiST indexes --- but then again, it's not entirely clear whether it's even still relevant for GiST indexes. Perhaps it's talking about a deficiency that was specific to the old rtree code. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления: