Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump emits ALTER TABLE ONLY partitioned_table
От | Amit Langote |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump emits ALTER TABLE ONLY partitioned_table |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 2509e5e9-4de2-1846-ddd0-6964f81d6c8b@lab.ntt.co.jp обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump emits ALTER TABLE ONLY partitioned_table (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump emits ALTER TABLE ONLY partitioned_table
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Stephen, On 2017/02/17 22:32, Stephen Frost wrote: > Amit, > > * Amit Langote (Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp) wrote: >> In certain cases, pg_dump's dumpTableSchema() emits a separate ALTER TABLE >> command for those schema elements of a table that could not be included >> directly in the CREATE TABLE command for the table. > > Any chance we could start adding regression tests for how pg_dump > handles partitions? I'm just about to the point where I have pretty > much everything else covered (at least in pg_dump.c, where it's not a > hard-to-reproduce error/exit case, or something version-dependent). > > If you have any questions about how the TAP tests for pg_dump work, or > about how to generate code-coverage checks to make sure you're at least > hitting every line (tho, of course, not every possible path), let me > know. I'd be happy to explain them. Yeah, I guess it would be a good idea to have some pg_dump TAP test coverage for the new partitioning stuff. I will look into that and get back to you if I don't grok something there. Thanks, Amit
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: