Re: BUG #8870: PL/PgSQL, SELECT .. INTO and the number of result columns
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #8870: PL/PgSQL, SELECT .. INTO and the number of result columns |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 25096.1390358888@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BUG #8870: PL/PgSQL, SELECT .. INTO and the number of result columns (Marko Tiikkaja <marko@joh.to>) |
Ответы |
Re: BUG #8870: PL/PgSQL, SELECT .. INTO and the number of
result columns
Re: BUG #8870: PL/PgSQL, SELECT .. INTO and the number of result columns |
Список | pgsql-bugs |
Marko Tiikkaja <marko@joh.to> writes: > On 1/19/14, 1:50 AM, I wrote: >> But making this check at run time doesn't seem too hard. How broken >> does the attached look? > A bit broken, now that I look at it in detail. In particular, I could > see someone doing something like: > CREATE TABLE lotsofcolumns(f1 int, f2 int, f3 int, ..); > DECLARE > f1 int; > f2 int; > BEGIN > SELECT * INTO f1, f2 FROM lotsofcolumns; > I can't say I think this is a good idea, but not sure breaking this case > is worth it either. Um, I thought the whole point was to complain about that. If this isn't a mistake, how can you consistently maintain the other one is? > In bug #8893 there was some discussion which I interpreted to mean that > we could improve this a bit by checking the number of returned columns > during compile time if there's no * in the target list. Attached is a > crude patch attempting to do that, which appears to be working. Any > thoughts? Ick. I thought you wanted to do this at first execution, anyway, not in pl_gram.y. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: