Re: BUG #17391: While using --with-ssl=openssl and PG_TEST_EXTRA='ssl' options, SSL tests fail on OpenBSD 7.0
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #17391: While using --with-ssl=openssl and PG_TEST_EXTRA='ssl' options, SSL tests fail on OpenBSD 7.0 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 2508106.1644714384@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BUG #17391: While using --with-ssl=openssl and PG_TEST_EXTRA='ssl' options, SSL tests fail on OpenBSD 7.0 (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: BUG #17391: While using --with-ssl=openssl and PG_TEST_EXTRA='ssl' options, SSL tests fail on OpenBSD 7.0
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> writes: > On Sun, Feb 13, 2022 at 10:56 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> I went ahead and pushed the patches-under-discussion (the larger >> one only to HEAD, for now). I've confirmed that the ssl tests >> are solid now under OpenBSD 7.0, on bare metal as well as on the >> VM I was using before. They are still broken under OpenBSD 6.8, >> which seems interesting but not so interesting that I want to >> spend more time on it (seeing that 6.8 is EOL as far as >> openbsd.org is concerned). Does anyone want to recheck 6.9? > Looks good: Thanks for checking! So I think the remaining question here is whether, and if so when, to back-patch faa189c93. I'm not sure that the benefit is worth the risk of new problems (though maybe I'm just feeling particularly pessimistic because of the regressions we've found in this week's releases). Leaving aside the behavior of the ssl tests, which few people would run anyway, it seems like the benefit is just to replace a not-very-helpful error message with a more-helpful one. That's worth something, but how much? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: