Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> OK, here is an updated doc patch that does that.
You're still only touching the variable-initialization case, which seems
like the least important place to document it. I'd have put it with
the assignment-statement documentation. Perhaps something like
<note>
<para>
Here, and in other contexts such as variable initialization,
the assignment operator can be written <literal>=</> as well
as <literal>:=</>. The latter is the preferred spelling, though.
</para>
</note>
> The next question is
> whether we want examples using '=' instead of ':='? Right now we have
> them, and Pavel's patch removed them.
AFAIR, we have some of both, and I'm fine with that status quo.
regards, tom lane