Re: Partitioning and constraint exclusion
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Partitioning and constraint exclusion |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 25017.1308673519@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Partitioning and constraint exclusion (Sylvain Rabot <sylvain@abstraction.fr>) |
Ответы |
Re: Partitioning and constraint exclusion
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Sylvain Rabot <sylvain@abstraction.fr> writes: > On Postgres 9.1beta2 when i run this code the first select will use > contraint exclusion but the second will not. > This apparently has something to do with the size of the array > returned by the fake immutable function. See predtest.c: /* * Proof attempts involving large arrays in ScalarArrayOpExpr nodes are * likely to require O(N^2) time, and more often than not fail anyway. * So we set an arbitrary limit on the number of array elements that * we will allow to be treated as an AND or OR clause. * XXX is it worth exposing this as a GUC knob? */ #define MAX_SAOP_ARRAY_SIZE 100 While you could possibly increase that, I think that your approach is bound to have terrible performance anyway. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: