Re: CAST from numeric(18,3) to numeric doesnt work, posgresql 13.3
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: CAST from numeric(18,3) to numeric doesnt work, posgresql 13.3 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 2501011.1628277029@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | CAST from numeric(18,3) to numeric doesnt work, posgresql 13.3 ("David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: CAST from numeric(18,3) to numeric doesnt work, posgresql 13.3
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
"David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com> writes: > Here is a recent newbie help request I fielded in Discord: > WITH RECURSIVE fizz_buzz (sequence, modulo_3, modulo_5) AS ( > SELECT 1, CAST('' AS CHAR(4)), CAST('' AS CHAR(4)) > UNION ALL > SELECT sequence + 1, > CASE WHEN MOD(sequence + 1, 3) = 0 THEN 'Fizz' > ELSE '' END, > CASE WHEN MOD(sequence + 1, 5) = 0 THEN 'Buzz' > ELSE '' END > FROM fizz_buzz > WHERE sequence < 100 > ) > SELECT > CASE WHEN CONCAT(modulo_3, modulo_5) = '' THEN sequence > ELSE CONCAT(modulo_3, modulo_5) END AS fizzbuzz > FROM fizz_buzz; I'd class that one as pilot error, in that the query author isn't even trying to make the two sides of the union agree type-wise. It's not the same as the point at hand, where someone did try to cast to the correct type but the parser ignored it. > And the just posted Bug 17137: > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/17137-3d3732d5a259612c%40postgresql.org > Are these related? Right, that one is a dup of the current issue. > I would agree with doing this in v14 then back-patch with the next update. Yeah, I'm going to push to v14 shortly if I don't hear objections soon. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: