Re: Plan time Improvement - 64bit bitmapset
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Plan time Improvement - 64bit bitmapset |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 25009.1244063503@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Plan time Improvement - 64bit bitmapset ("Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>) |
Ответы |
Re: Plan time Improvement - 64bit bitmapset
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
"Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov> writes: > Since he can't share the schema, and hasn't even given much of a hint, > I don't know whether one (or more) of the columns is a bytea filled > with 100 MB values; and I don't remember any description of the > hardware environment either. Since the behavior seems so > out-of-the-ordinary, I was casting about for possible extraordinary > characteristics of his environment which might cause it. I'm probably > way off base.... There's a hard-wired restriction in analyze.c that makes it discard data values wider than 1KB on-sight. So no such value will ever be found in a statistics array. You could still have a few meg in a pg_statistics row, I suppose, but not a really horrendous amount. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: