Re: [HACKERS] Failure in commit_ts tap tests
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Failure in commit_ts tap tests |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 24cf2b76-9b9f-bba9-7e8b-89b9d0ba2471@2ndQuadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Failure in commit_ts tap tests (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Failure in commit_ts tap tests
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 01/20/2017 01:22 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Pavan Deolasee <pavan.deolasee@gmail.com> writes: >> I'm surprised nobody reported this problem earlier. > It looks like at least part of the answer is that the buildfarm isn't > running this test. AFAICS, it runs "make installcheck" not > "make check" in src/test/modules. I don't know whether any of the > critters would have duplicated the failure, but they weren't trying. > > I don't know if any of the other src/test/modules/ subdirectories > test more in make check mode than make installcheck mode, but if > they do, we probably oughta change the buildfarm script. > > Is there a reason why these tests aren't run under installcheck? If there is a justification I can look at it, or we should decide on one canonical mode of running the tests and stick to that. cheers andrew -- Andrew Dunstan https://www.2ndQuadrant.com PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: