Re: possible bug in 8.4
От | Grzegorz Jaskiewicz |
---|---|
Тема | Re: possible bug in 8.4 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 24C7D056-28F5-406A-A58B-DC0F0BF4B538@pointblue.com.pl обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: possible bug in 8.4 ("Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>) |
Ответы |
Re: possible bug in 8.4
Re: possible bug in 8.4 |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
true, but as soon as I drop indices on both tables: root=# explain analyze select a.a from a where a not in (select a from b); QUERY PLAN ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Seq Scan on a (cost=88677.00..187207.00 rows=3000000 width=4) (actual time=22803.470..26473.039 rows=600000 loops=1) Filter: (NOT (hashed subplan)) SubPlan -> Seq Scan on b (cost=0.00..75177.00rows=5400000 width=4) (actual time=9.232..15828.904 rows=5400000 loops=1) Total runtime: 29357.267 ms (5 rows) root=# select version(); version -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PostgreSQL 8.3.5 on i686-redhat-linux-gnu, compiled by GCC gcc (GCC) 3.4.6 20060404 (Red Hat 3.4.6-10) (1 row) I thought planner should be able to choose plan that costs less.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: