Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> Seems we should increase to 24 or 32. Is there a
> downside to the increase. I can't even imagine a performance hit.
Darn if I know. We should try to measure it before assuming it's
insignificant. At the very least, it'd increase the size of pg_proc
by about a third ...
regards, tom lane