Re: BUG #16140: View with INSERT, DO INSTEAD, and ON CONFLICT causes an error
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: BUG #16140: View with INSERT, DO INSTEAD, and ON CONFLICT causes an error |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 24978.1574965593@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | BUG #16140: View with INSERT, DO INSTEAD, and ON CONFLICT causes an error (PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org>) |
| Ответы |
Re: BUG #16140: View with INSERT, DO INSTEAD, and ON CONFLICT causesan error
Re: BUG #16140: View with INSERT, DO INSTEAD, and ON CONFLICT causesan error |
| Список | pgsql-bugs |
PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org> writes:
> When creating an updatable "complex" view, if an ON CONFLICT clause is
> provided, an INSERT SELECT to that view will cause "ERROR: variable not
> found in subplan target lists". Removing the ON CONFLICT clause eliminates
> the error message.
I believe the problem is that you wrote the ON CONFLICT clause
incorrectly:
> ON CONFLICT (slo_id, time_window, tags) DO UPDATE SET value = NEW.value
You should have written "EXCLUDED.value" not "NEW.value". There is
a bug here, but it's that the parser accepted this rule. I'm guessing
that the parsing logic for ON CONFLICT didn't consider the possibility
that NEW and OLD for a rule would already be in the range table.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: