Re: BUG #18407: ALTER TABLE SET SCHEMA on foreign table with SERIAL column does not move sequence to new schema
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #18407: ALTER TABLE SET SCHEMA on foreign table with SERIAL column does not move sequence to new schema |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 2497748.1711383445@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | BUG #18407: ALTER TABLE SET SCHEMA on foreign table with SERIAL column does not move sequence to new schema (PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: BUG #18407: ALTER TABLE SET SCHEMA on foreign table with SERIAL column does not move sequence to new schema
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org> writes: > I created a foreign table with a serial column and then moved the table to a > different schema. The sequence bound to the table column wasn't moved to the > new schema. I expected the sequence to be moved as well just like it works > for regular tables. Hmm ... that does seem fairly inconsistent. It looks like the cause is in AlterTableNamespaceInternal: /* Fix other dependent stuff */ if (rel->rd_rel->relkind == RELKIND_RELATION || rel->rd_rel->relkind == RELKIND_MATVIEW || rel->rd_rel->relkind == RELKIND_PARTITIONED_TABLE) { AlterIndexNamespaces(classRel, rel, oldNspOid, nspOid, objsMoved); AlterSeqNamespaces(classRel, rel, oldNspOid, nspOid, objsMoved, AccessExclusiveLock); AlterConstraintNamespaces(RelationGetRelid(rel), oldNspOid, nspOid, false, objsMoved); } It's probably reasonable to have this relkind gating for AlterIndexNamespaces, although I'm not sure it saves much to skip that, either. But we can have sequences attached to foreign tables, and I think maybe constraints as well. Maybe it'd be best to just drop this relkind check altogether? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: