Re: [PORTS] HP-UX port
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PORTS] HP-UX port |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 2495.933285749@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PORTS] HP-UX port (Michael J Schout <mschout@mail.gkg-com.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [PORTS] HP-UX port
|
Список | pgsql-ports |
Michael J Schout <mschout@mail.gkg-com.com> writes: > The expected part shows: > QUERY: SELECT random FROM RANDOM_TBL > WHERE random NOT BETWEEN 80 AND 120; > random > ------ > (0 rows) > and the actual results are: > QUERY: SELECT random FROM RANDOM_TBL > WHERE random NOT BETWEEN 80 AND 120; > random > ------ > 123 > (1 row) > Which looks like a genuine bug to me :). No, that's expected behavior, actually. The random test wouldn't be random if it didn't fail occasionally :-). The parameters are set so that the "expected" results are produced most of the time. If you get a non-expected result from random more than about one time in five, then it's worth investigating... but if you *never* got an unexpected result, it would suggest the random function wasn't working... > I am on a V2250 machine which is a 16 cpu PA-RISC 2.0 environment. Which is > a pure 64 bit environment. HP-UX will no longer support 32 bit environments > beginning with 11.01. Interestingly, this bug is not 100% repeatable. > When I run the test, about half otf the time the bug happens. The other > half, the test runs to completion. Interesting. May or may not be a 64-bit issue; it might be a problem with the machine-dependent spinlock code. Check out src/include/storage/s_lock.h and src/backend/storage/buffer/s_lock.c. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-ports по дате отправления: