Re: Index AM change proposals, redux
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Index AM change proposals, redux |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 24934.1207866632@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Index AM change proposals, redux (Heikki Linnakangas <heikki@enterprisedb.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Index AM change proposals, redux
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Heikki Linnakangas <heikki@enterprisedb.com> writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> Heikki Linnakangas <heikki@enterprisedb.com> writes: >>> Note that we'll need to add candidate match support to the regular index >>> scan API as well for that. >> >> [ confused... ] Thought you'd done that in this patch? > No, I only modified the bitmap scan API. Okay. I applied what you'd done (with minor revisions), but we'll have to fix up the regular indexscan API before anything can be done about @@@. I'll take a look at that part tomorrow. Teodor, do you have any thoughts about exactly how you'd fix @@@ ? I suppose that the recheck-need is not really a property of specific tuples, but of a particular query, for that case. Where would you want to detect that? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: