Re: Oracle 10g Express - any danger for Postgres?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Oracle 10g Express - any danger for Postgres? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 24875.1130852966@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Oracle 10g Express - any danger for Postgres? (Jan Wieck <JanWieck@Yahoo.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Oracle 10g Express - any danger for Postgres?
Re: Oracle 10g Express - any danger for Postgres? Re: Oracle 10g Express - any danger for Postgres? Re: Oracle 10g Express - any danger for Postgres? |
Список | pgsql-general |
Jan Wieck <JanWieck@Yahoo.com> writes: > On 10/31/2005 1:14 PM, Chris Browne wrote: >> The fact that it appears "a joke" to people wanting to deploy big >> databases doesn't prevent it from taking a painful bite out of, oh, >> say, certain vendors that forgot to own their own transactional >> storage engine... > It's not a joke. It fits exactly the "small web application" needs. Who > will want to pay for a commercial MySQL license when they can run Oracle > for free? People who can't figure out how to configure Postgres are not likely to get far with Oracle ;-). Unless Oracle has made some *huge* strides in ease of installation/administration with 10g, I see this making practically no dent in MySQL. Or PG for that matter. All they're really likely to accomplish is to cannibalize some of their own low-end sales. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: