Re: BUG #18195: PL/pgSQL: invalid syntax allowed in SELECT INTO statement
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #18195: PL/pgSQL: invalid syntax allowed in SELECT INTO statement |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 2486681.1699975861@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | BUG #18195: PL/pgSQL: invalid syntax allowed in SELECT INTO statement (PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: BUG #18195: PL/pgSQL: invalid syntax allowed in SELECT INTO statement
RE: BUG #18195: PL/pgSQL: invalid syntax allowed in SELECT INTO statement |
Список | pgsql-bugs |
PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org> writes: > 1. The following code is successfully executed although it has incorrect > syntax: there must be comma (,) between _n and _s in 'into' section. > select 1, 'string1', 'string2' > into _n _s; I believe this is being read the same as select 1, 'string1', 'string2' _s into _n; That is, the lack of a comma causes the INTO sub-clause to end, and then _s is taken as an AS-less column label. As the manual explains, for backwards-compatibility reasons we allow INTO to be embedded anywhere in the command, even though that leads to surprising-looking cases like this one. As for the question of why you don't get an error for the wrong number of INTO targets, again that's backwards compatibility. There's a "strict_multi_assignment" check you can turn on to make it complain about that [1]. regards, tom lane [1] https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/plpgsql-development-tips.html#PLPGSQL-EXTRA-CHECKS
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: