Re: Deadlock with pg_dump?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Deadlock with pg_dump? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 24865.1164084015@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Deadlock with pg_dump? (Chris Campbell <chris@bignerdranch.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Chris Campbell <chris@bignerdranch.com> writes: > On Oct 26, 2006, at 17:21, Tom Lane wrote: >> And what was 1171 doing? I really doubt that either of these could >> have been pg_dump. > I know that process 1120 is a Java client (Hibernate) running an > UPDATE query, but I have no idea what 1171 is. I doubt that 1171 was > pg_dump, but when we turn off the pg_dump cron jobs (for 12-ish > hours), the deadlocks go away. We usually see 5 or 6 deadlocks spread > throughout the day. That's not definitive evidence, of course, but > it's certainly curious. FWIW, we recently found a deadlock risk that's likely to be triggered in situations involving multiple updates and foreign keys. I still don't see any connection to pg_dump, but otherwise it seems like it might be related to your problem. Try this patch: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2006-11/msg00121.php regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: