Re: How does TOAST compare to other databases' mechanisms?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: How does TOAST compare to other databases' mechanisms? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 2485.971540492@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: How does TOAST compare to other databases' mechanisms? (Philip Warner <pjw@rhyme.com.au>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
> This sounds fine, but begs the question: if there is TOASTed data in the > table and the column is set to 'not TOASTed', will TOAST cope? And vice verca? Yes; the detoasting mechanism doesn't pay any attention to attstorage, only to what's actually in the stored tuple. attstorage is only examined while storing a tuple, and it's really only advisory anyway (see tuptoaster.c). The only "must" involved here is that you must not set attstorage to anything but 'p' for a non-toastable data type; which you determine by checking the type's pg_type entry (typstorage != 'p' means toastable). >> All told it might be a couple >> hundred lines of new or changed code. Pretty much all of this could >> be done by cribbing from existing code (ie. programming-by-example) >> which is a good thing because there's not much documentation. > So it might be worh documenting, too... Yes, if you wanted to keep notes and work them up into documentation for future hackers, that'd be a nice side benefit. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: