Re: Server hangs on multiple connections
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Server hangs on multiple connections |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 24787.1032543246@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Server hangs on multiple connections (David Christian <davidc@comtechmobile.com>) |
Список | pgsql-bugs |
David Christian <davidc@comtechmobile.com> writes: > On Friday, Sep 20, 2002, at 11:30 US/Eastern, Tom Lane wrote: >> Another interesting line of attack would be to try compiling >> src/backend/storage/lmgr/lwlock.c at different optimization levels, [ and indeed the problem goes away at -O0 ] > So, is it safe to proceed this way? If this turns out to be the > solution, is there anything I should be aware of with regard to > stability and performance vs. a normal install? This should be stable; whether there's a measurable performance hit from de-optimizing just that one file is hard to say. At this point I would say that the problem is that the compiler's optimizer is rearranging the order of operations inside lwlock.c in a way that breaks the code for parallel operations. This could be a compiler bug, or it could be that the compiler is doing something it's allowed to do under the C specification --- in which case we need to add some more "volatile"s to fix it. Could you send me (off-list, since it's likely to be large) the lwlock.s file produced by gcc -O0 -I../../../../src/include -S lwlock.c as well as the one produced by gcc -O1 -I../../../../src/include -S lwlock.c Groveling through the assembly code should at least tell me what's being changed ... regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: