Re: 9.1.2 ?

Greg Smith <greg@2ndQuadrant.com> writes:
> I was curious how 9.0 fared last year for comparison, here's that data:

> Version Date      Days  Weeks
> 9.0.0    09/20/10
> 9.0.1    10/04/10    14    2.0
> 9.0.2    12/16/10    73    10.4
> 9.0.3    01/31/11    46    6.6
> 9.0.4    04/18/11    77    11.0
> 9.0.5    09/26/11    161   23.0

> So the average for the first three point releases was around 6 weeks apart.

The 9.0.1 and 9.0.3 releases were both forced by security issues,
so I think that's an unusually low average.

Having said that, if enough people think that those backup issues are
critical-data-loss problems, I won't stand in the way of making a
release now.  But like you, I'm not exactly convinced we're done with
those issues.
        regards, tom lane