Re: vacuum analyze corrupts database
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: vacuum analyze corrupts database |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 24660.1053910984@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: vacuum analyze corrupts database (Michael Brusser <michael@synchronicity.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: vacuum analyze corrupts database
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Michael Brusser <michael@synchronicity.com> writes: > (dbx) where 30 > =>[1] pfree(0x489420, 0xffbee890, 0x489420, 0xffbee880, 0x489628, > 0xffbee888), at 0x2535e4 > [2] convert_to_scalar(0x489078, 0x19, 0xffbee890, 0x489008, 0x488fc0, > 0x413), at 0x1fc6b4 > [3] scalarineqsel(0x484608, 0x42a, 0x0, 0x488a88, 0x489078, 0x19), at > 0x1f94e4 Hmm. Are you running the database in a non-C locale? (pg_controldata would tell you.) If so, this pfree is trying to pfree one of three strings that were filled with strxfrm(). I am wondering if strxfrm() on your platform sometimes writes more bytes than it is supposed to. I have seen vsnprintf() overrun its output buffer on some flavors of Solaris (according to FAQ_Solaris, the 64-bit libc in Solaris 7 had such a problem). Could there be a similar bug in their strxfrm? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: