Re: elog cleanup

Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> [ 100K+ patch ]

If you're going to hit every file in the backend in pursuit of this
idea, *puh-leeze* get it right the FIRST time, rather than subjecting
us all to multiple rounds of break-everyone-else's-patches-in-progress.

Things you did not get right include: where's the PG_ prefix?
And what happened to merging the debug-level mechanism with the
error level codes?

> o Add INFO level that prints only to the client
> o Add LOG level to print messages only to the server log

I still object strongly to this worldview.  The code should not have
a hard-wired concept of which messages are for the client and which
are for the log.

            regards, tom lane