Re: Errno checks for rmtree()
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Errno checks for rmtree() |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 24650.1108256353@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Errno checks for rmtree() (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Errno checks for rmtree()
|
Список | pgsql-patches |
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > + static void > + rmtree_errno(char *filepath) > + { > + if (errno == EACCES) > + #ifndef FRONTEND > + elog(LOG, "no permission to remove \"%s\"", filepath); > + #else > + fprintf(stderr, "no permission to remove \"%s\"", filepath); > + #endif > + else if (errno == EBUSY) > [ etc ] This seems awfully bogus: it's incomplete and not in the style of our other error messages. Why not just one case: #ifndef FRONTEND elog(LOG, "could not remove \"%s\": %m", filepath); #else fprintf(stderr, "could not remove \"%s\": %s\n", filepath, strerror(errno)); #endif Also, I'm unconvinced that LOG is the appropriate error level; WARNING would probably be better. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: