Re: Proposal: TABLE functions

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Proposal: TABLE functions
Дата
Msg-id 24640.1171033329@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Proposal: TABLE functions  ("Pavel Stehule" <pavel.stehule@hotmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
"Pavel Stehule" <pavel.stehule@hotmail.com> writes:
> it can by more simple than I though. I need only one flag, and if its true 
> then I don't create language variables for OUT params. But I need one next 
> column in pg_proc.

I thought you said this was just syntactic sugar for capabilities we
already had?

> Currently a lot of columns in pg_proc is bool. What about one binary columns 
> for other options? I hope so next versions can support autonomous 
> transaction, which need flag too.

I think stored procedures of that sort aren't functions at all, and
probably don't belong in pg_proc.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Alvaro Herrera
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PATCHES] plpgsql, return can contains any expression
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Variable length varlena headers redux