Re: The Contrib Roundup (long)
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: The Contrib Roundup (long) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 2459.1118611672@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: The Contrib Roundup (long) ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: The Contrib Roundup (long)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org> writes: > On Sat, 11 Jun 2005, Tom Lane wrote: >> It's always bothered me too. How about >> >> REINDEX SYSTEM -> system tables (current meaning of R. DATABASE) >> REINDEX USER -> all non-system tables >> REINDEX DATABASE -> both of the above > Why all the choices? What cases are there for doing one without the > other? If you want to get 'fine tuned', do a 'REINDEX TABLE' ... I can > see REINDEX SYSTEM and REINDEX DATABASE (includes SYSTEM), but not the > USER one .. The main argument I can think of for REINDEX USER is that it could be executed by someone who isn't necessarily superuser. Not sure how important that is, though. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: