Re: Feature request - CREATE TYPE ... WITH OID = oid_number.
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Feature request - CREATE TYPE ... WITH OID = oid_number. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 24583.1291743428@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Feature request - CREATE TYPE ... WITH OID = oid_number. (Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Feature request - CREATE TYPE ... WITH OID = oid_number.
Re: Feature request - CREATE TYPE ... WITH OID = oid_number. |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com> writes: > On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 11:49 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> Say what? �He didn't say that, he said "don't assume that user-defined >> types have hard-wired OIDs". > Well, you're right, strictly speaking. Of course, the OP is not > assuming it, he is enforcing it. No, he's wishing he could enforce it. Which will work, mostly, until the day it doesn't because of a pre-existing collision. And then he'll be up the creek with a lot of software that he can't fix readily. I concur with Andrew's advice: don't go there in the first place. Use a cache to mitigate the costs of looking up user-defined OIDs, and you won't regret it later. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: