Re: Assertion failure with LEFT JOINs among >500 relations
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Assertion failure with LEFT JOINs among >500 relations |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 245480.1603063513@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Assertion failure with LEFT JOINs among >500 relations (David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Assertion failure with LEFT JOINs among >500 relations
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> writes: > On Mon, 19 Oct 2020 at 12:10, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> TBH, I see no need to do anything in the back branches. This is not >> an issue for production usage. > I understand the Assert failure is pretty harmless, so non-assert > builds shouldn't suffer too greatly. I just assumed that any large > stakeholders invested in upgrading to a newer version of PostgreSQL > may like to run various tests with their application against an assert > enabled version of PostgreSQL perhaps to gain some confidence in the > upgrade. A failing assert is unlikely to inspire additional > confidence. If any existing outside regression tests hit such corner cases, then (a) we'd have heard about it, and (b) likely they'd fail in the older branch as well. So I don't buy the argument that this will dissuade somebody from upgrading. I do, on the other hand, buy the idea that if anyone is indeed working in this realm, they might be annoyed by a behavior change in a stable branch. So it cuts both ways. On balance I don't think we should touch this in the back branches. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: